Legal Opinion

City Bank & Trust Co. v. Graf

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 11, 1932No. 8802PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) There is only one question raised by the assignments of error in the bill of exceptions, to wit: whether the court erred in overruling the demurrers of the City Bank & Trust Company, and W. J. Davis, superintendent of banks, to the petition of Graf, trustee. Plaintiffs in error earnestly insist that their demurrers should have been sustained. This contention is based upon the several grounds which are embodied in the demurrers, which are more compactly summarized in the brief of counsel for plaintiffs in error.

*345Grounds 1 and 2 of the general demurrer are as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Young v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. May v. PrintupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Harper v. City of NashvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Merchants' & Planters' National Bank v. Trustees of Masonic HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dillon v. ElmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Stiles v. StilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. City Bank & Trust Co. v. GrafSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. City Bank & Trust Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Heymann v. O'ConnellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API