Legal Opinion

Meloy v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 29, 1889PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Cedar Rapids Superior Court. — Hon. John T. Stoneman, Judge. Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, for which defendant is alleged to be responsible.' There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In the summer of the year 1884 plaintiff was in the employment of defendant, and was engaged as a civil engineer in superintending the laying of the track on a new line of railway which defendant was then constructing from Belle Plaine to What Cheer. He was not required to see that the track was kept in good condition after it was laid. On the third day of August of the year named the track had been laid from Belle Plaine to a point about thirty-five miles *745south. On that day plaintiff, who was in Belle Plaine to visit his family, was ordered to go to the front with a wrecking train, which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doggett v. Illinois Central R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  2. Player v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Martin v. Des Moines Edison Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Gordon v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Kinsel v. North Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Ferris v. ShandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API