Legal Opinion

Coppock v. Reed

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 6, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Craioford District Court. — E. G. Albert, Judge. A demurrer to the petition on the' ground that the facts alleged did not warrant the relief sought,, was sustained. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

According to allegations of the petition, plaintiff was convicted of the crime of cheating, in 1911, sentenced to serve 7 years in the penitentiary, so did, and about 18 months after his discharge, discovered evidence which, in connection with that adduced at the trial, as is alleged, established his innocence; and in this action he prayed that the records in which false statements appear, injurious to plaintiff’s rights, be annulled and changed, and that said statements be expunged from such records. It seems that plaintiff drew a check for $6.50 on the First *582National Bank of Shenandoah,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Downs v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Asbell v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Hodgeman v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. StanleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Keane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Boyd v. SmythSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Charles Harlan Bales v. P. A. Lainson, Warden, Lowa State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API