Parkhurst v. Wyoming
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254. The trial court construed all the claims as lying in habeas corpus and denied relief for failure to exhaust state remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm in part and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Robert Simpson v. Tim RowanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fisher v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Offet v. SolemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.