Kenner v. Peck
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of Catahoula, Mayo, J. cited 2 Mart. N. S. 84. 17 La. 371. 3 Rob. 258. relied on C. P. 347 to 350. 7 Mart. N. S. 269. Bradford v. Cooper, 1 An. R. 325. 12 Rob. 243.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was-pronounced by
SiiiDEM,, J.
The plaintiff sues as holder of a promissory note made by the-defendant to the order of Taylorr, Gardiner Sf Co., and by them endorsed, payable at their counting-house in New Orleans. There was judgment for thff plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed. •
The first point urged by the defendant is, that the court below impx-operly refused him time to obtain the answers of the plaintiff to interrogatoiies propounded. The purport of these intei’rogatories was, to ascertain fi'om the plaintiff whether Taylor, Gardiner & Co. were not the real…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. MorenoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert v. Blythe Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- Lewis Chevrolet Co. v. WhitenerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Hardy-Harris Ins. Agency v. Louisiana Ice Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Campbell v. ClarkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bernos v. MichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929