Legal Opinion

Glos v. Huey

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

The appellee obtained a decree in the • court below against Jacob Glos and the appellant, setting aside a certain tax deed to Jacob Glos, and a quit-claim deed from him to the appellant, as clouds upon the complainant’s title.

The bill alleged that the complainant (appellee here) was the owner in fee of the property, and that it was vacant and unoccupied. These were material allegations, and, being denied by the answer of appellant, should have been proved. It does not appear from the evidence whether any person was in possession of the premises or whether they were vacant and unoccupied. To…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Glos v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Harland v. EastmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glos v. GreinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API