Campbell v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Nevada’ Circuit Court; Geo. B. Eaynie, Judge; 1. The testimony is conflicting, but the verdict of the jury is conclusive. 104 Ark. 192; 103 id. 4; 101 Id. 51; 100 Id. 330. There is no error in the record.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Appellant prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction for selling intoxicating liquors.(1) One of the grounds of his motion for a new trial is that the court erred in overruling his motion for a continuance. The motion does not appear in the record, and the presumption is that the action of the court was correct. Kinslow v. State, 85 Ark. 514.
The only remaining ground in appellant’s motion for a new trial is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict.(2) A witness testified that he twice bought a pint of whiskey from appellant on the Saturday night before the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kinslow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908