Legal Opinion

In re S.D.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 2015No. COA14–1363Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

I.D. ("Respondent"), the father of S.D. ("Sarah")1 , age 12, and S.D. ("Stacy"), age 14, (collectively "the children"), appeals from the trial court's orders ceasing reunification efforts and appointing the maternal grandparents as guardians for the children. On appeal, Respondent argues that the trial court erred in (1) ceasing reunification efforts and making a guardianship appointment because the conditions which led to the children's removal from his care were no longer present; and (2) failing to properly verify the maternal grandparents' financial resources pursuant to N.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. In re C.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Matter of WhisnantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. In re R.A.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. In re J.E.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API