Legal Opinion

State v. Matlock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 1989No. 88-00761PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Judge.

Appellee Matlock pleaded guilty to burglary of a dwelling and battering an occupant therein (Count I) and petit theft (Count II). At sentencing, the trial judge departed downward from the recommended guidelines range based on appellee’s age of 17 and his minimal prior record. The state *245appealed, claiming that the reasons for departure were invalid. We reverse.

Neither of the reasons set forth by the trial court are valid. The defendant’s prior record was included in his guidelines score, so it cannot be considered as a basis for departure. See State v. Davis, 537 So.2d 192…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. State v. RileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API