Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC v. Seth Casden
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 MULTIPLE ENERGY Case № 2:21-cv-01149-ODW (RAOx) TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS 13 v. [218][219][220][228] 14 SETH CASDEN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC (“MET”) brought this action 20 against Defendant Seth Casden for false advertising and tortious interference with 21 contractual relations. After a jury trial, the Court granted in part MET’s Federal Rule 22 of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 50(a) motion on one claim, the jury…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.