Legal Opinion
Chittick v. Thompson Hill Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.
The sole question for determination upon this appeal is whether an alteration in an assignment of a mortgage made after execution, acknowledgment and delivery, with the consent and approval of all parties in interest, affects its validity so that after it is recorded it does not constitute constructive notice to subsequent lienors.
The assignee of the two bonds and mortgages consented upon the request of the mortgagee assignor to accept in place of the bonds and mortgages assigned, two other bonds and mortgages for the same amount, upon different premises. The two new bonds and mortgages were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Ogden Building & Loan Ass'n v. MenschIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Titus v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Kothe v. Krag-Reynolds Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stockschlaeder & McDonald, Esqs. v. Kittay (In Re Stockbridge Funding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Provident Bank v. Community Home Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Trajam Realty Corp. v. HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Camfield v. Luther Forest Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Ackerman v. Physicians & Surgeons HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.