Legal Opinion

Furr v. Brookhaven Creamery Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1939No. 33829PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

On Motion to Strike.

2Opinion of the Court · McGowenMcGowen, J.

On the appeal of Furr and others, as heirs at law of Albert Furr, the appellee, the Brookhaven Creamery Company, moves to strike the stenographer’s notes on file herein from the record.

The undisputed facts pertinent to this motion are as follows: A. L. Furr and others, as next of kin and heirs at law of A. E. Furr, brought an action for damages against the Brookhaven Creamery Company and Hugh Nettles, • alleging negligence on the part of Nettles as the agent'or servant of the Brookhaven Creamery Company, causing injuries to Albert Earl Furr resulting in death.

In the trial…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  2. H. Weston Lumber Co. v. HibbensMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wilkinson v. LoveMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cole v. ToddMississippi Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API