Legal Opinion

Powell v. . Stone

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1815PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, by protestation, denies that the river Neuse, at the place where, etc., is a navigable river, or that he has any knowledge of the plaintiff, his land or fishery, except that he is informed that Powell lives 15 miles above the dam, and Dunn ______ miles above it; and, for plea, saith that he built the dam on his own land, for the purpose of giving him a head of water to turn mills and other machinery, and not with an intent to injure the plaintiff. Demurrer and joinder.

The cause was argued at a former term by Browne for the defendant, and at this term by Nash for the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farmers Co-Operative Manufacturing Co. v. Albemarle & Raleigh RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Hudson v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. City of Durham v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Hathaway v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  5. Jackson ex dem. Wyck v. SewardNew York Supreme Court · 1825

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. City of Durham v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Pruitt v. . BethellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API