AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. v. THYGESEN
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Wyrick, J.:
¶1 The district court in this case sanctioned Honda Motor Company for "destroying evidence." The evidence-a computer program that Honda uses when designing new models of its vehicles 1 -had been deleted *1060 pursuant to a routine document-retention policy some 12 years prior to the accident that sparked this litigation. 2 The Plaintiff in the case wants the computer program so that his expert can use it to attempt to demonstrate that Honda could have designed a safer car. The computer program is expensive-between two and three million dollars according to Plaintiff-so he understandably…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warren v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. District Court of Kingfisher County, Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- AKINS v. BEN MILAM HEAT AIR & ELECTRIC INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2019
- IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. v. THYGESENSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- IN RE AMENDMENTS TO OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022