Legal Opinion

State v. Fenderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1876No. 6018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION of David Eonderson for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Ludeling, G. J.

The petitioner represents that “on the twelfth of May, 1875, there was returned into the Superior Criminal Court of New ■Orleans, by a body styling themselves a grand jury, a ‘ true bill,’ indicting petitioner for murder.” He represents that he was tried on said indictment and convicted and was sentenced to be hung. Ho representa that the men styling themselves a grand jury were not grand jurors, and had no right or authority in law to indict petitioner, because they were selected or organized by George H. Braughn, who was not judge ■of said court at the time, and that the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex parte DegenerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  2. State Ex Rel. McIsaac v. SiglerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. State v. HemlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Voice of the Ex-Offender v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API