Legal Opinion
In re Stark
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 2003PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Charles B. Stark was admitted to the practice of *5law in the State of New York as Charles Bruce Stark by the Second Judicial Department on September 13, 1971 and, at all times relevant herein, has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that he has automatically been disbarred upon Ms conviction of a felony, as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e).
Responden…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re MerolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re JacobiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4Cited by13 opinions
- In re SilbermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re KozlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re GengerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of LessoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re AuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.