Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Ohrenstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Rothwax, J.

Following the Court of Appeals favorable ruling on the defendants’1 petition for a writ of prohibition against continued prosecution, based upon the absence of fair notice that use of the State legislative payroll to hire persons exclusively to work in political campaigns of insurgent Democratic candidates was larceny (People v Ohrenstein, 77 NY2d 38, 52 [1990]), the indictment herein was reduced to those counts of offering a false instrument for filing (Penal Law § 175.35) and grand larceny (Penal Law former §§ 155.35, 155.30) which alleged that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API