Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Stockton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.
Appellee, in the statement of his cause of action in the court below, stated that the land, for the burning of the grass and injury to turf upon which he sues, was owned by him. He proved on the trial that he had been in possession of the land for ten or twelve years, and, standing alone, this might have been prima facie evidence of ownership which would have authorized him to recover. He was himself introduced upon the stand, however, and testified: “The land, damage to which is sued for by me, was not, at the time of the fire, owned by me. It belonged to my…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lee v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- H. H. Rowland & Bro. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Davis v. McGeheeTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. FlatoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hicks v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Lane v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Kreisle v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Hughes-Buie Co. v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- McGrew v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.