Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2006No. S-04-1396PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

The question presented in this case is whether the substantive law of Nebraska or Delaware applies to a complaint alleging oppression of a shareholder of a Delaware corporation, the sole asset of which is all the stock of a Nebraska corporation. Given the allegations made in this case, we conclude that Delaware law controls whether the plaintiff has stated a cause of action, and therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Neb. Ct.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Harrison v. NetCentric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Vantagepoint Venture Partners 1996 v. Examen, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  5. Ernest J. Nagy v. Riblet Products Corporation, David Bistricer, and Nachum SteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nebraska Coalition for Educational Equity & Adequacy v. HeinemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Doe v. Omaha Public School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Christian v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Midwest Renewable Energy v. American Engr. TestingNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Classic Coffee Concepts, Inc. v. AndersonNorth Carolina Business Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API