Pines v. Farrell
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Justice EAKIN.
Although I agree with my colleagues’ conclusion that § 3502(a) of the Judicial Code authorizes the Court Administrator to promulgate a regulation interpreting the term “property transfer,” I believe the regulation’s characterization of mortgages,1 mortgage assignments, releases, and satisfactions, as “property transfers” for purposes of 42 Pa.C.S. § 3733(a.l)(l)(v) is not in accord with the law. Thus, I offer my dissent.
There is ample authority that in Pennsylvania, although a mortgage involves a conveyance, such a conveyance functions as a lien. “A mortgage,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinowichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Tryon v. MunsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Day v. OstergardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Salter v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.