Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brazzle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1979No. 1069PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that (1) he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive his right to appeal by withdrawing his post-verdict motions; (2) the sentence imposed on his conviction for theft is illegal because the theft conviction merged with his robbery conviction; and (3) the sentences imposed were excessive. We agree only with appellant’s second allegation and, accordingly, vacate his sentence on the theft charge.

The charges against appellant arose from his participation in a bank robbery. Appellant was convicted by a jury of two counts of robbery, theft by unlawful taking,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. WronaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth v. KnightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. WarehamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. KerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Com. v. Cupitt, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. v. Fisher, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API