Cox v. Hale
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
This is a will contest by ibill in equity after probate.
In numerous ways complainant raised the point in the court below that the will is void on its face. This question is first presented in assignments of error and briefs on this appeal.
In “second” item of the will, the testator, Johnson B. Hale, devised a house and lot in the city of Gadsden, definitely described, to complainant, his daughter, Norma Cox.
In “fourth” item he devised and bequeathed to his wife, Della Hale, and six children, naming them, “all my real property or mixed property that I may die seized and possessed.” *
The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bancroft v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Coghill v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Blakey's Heirs v. Blakey'sSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Councill v. MayhewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Hornaday v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Kahalley v. KahalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- In Re Lunders' EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.