Legal Opinion
DePodesta v. Breaux
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 2013No. 2012-CA-1594PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES F. McKAY III, Chief Judge.
11Defendani/appellant, Dail Breaux (“Breaux”), appeals the trial court’s judgment, decreeing that plaintiff/appellee, Arthur DePodesta (“DePodesta”), did not sell his sixty percent ownership interest in La-kart Food Services, L.L.C. (“Lakart”) to Breaux. Finding no error, we affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
DePodesta created Lakart in 2000, and began operating the kitchen at Cooter Brown’s, a New Orleans tavern. In October 2005, DePodesta brought Breaux into the business. Pursuant to a written agreement, Breaux was given a forty percent ownership…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tweedel v. BrasseauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Watters v. Department of Social ServicesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Philips v. BernerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Sam Staub Enterprises, Inc. v. ChapitalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Walker v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michael O. Read v. Willwoods CommunitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- Bayou Construction Group, LLC v. City of New Orleans, Tktmj, Incorporated, Cp Grace & Associates, Incorporated, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Jane Doe, John Doe, Jane Smith & John SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
- Kusai Abdelqader v. Ramon Ramos, Jr., Delisha Boyd, LLC, Delisha Young Boyd, and Kristen L. Young-BoydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022