Legal Opinion

Kuh v. Glucklick

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 20, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

.Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hotr. J. D. Gamble, Judge. Action of replevin, brought by the plaintiff corporation to recover possession of certain goods alleged to be detained by the defendant Glucklick, then a merchant doing business at Perry.

Read the full summary

.Appeal from Dallas District Court. — Hotr. J. D. Gamble, Judge. Action of replevin, brought by the plaintiff corporation to recover possession of certain goods alleged to be detained by the defendant Glucklick, then a merchant doing business at Perry. At the time of filing the petition plaintiff procured a writ to be issued and delivered to the sheriff of the county, under which a portion of the goods described in the petition were taken possession of and delivered to plaintiff. It appears that thereafter Glucklick was adjudged a bankrupt in the United States District Court, upon his…

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, C. J.

First as to the appeal of the defendant: Boyd. The petition alleges the facts constituting the wrongful detention of the x>roperty, according to the belief of plaintiff, to be that defendant Glucldick claims to have purchased the same of plaintiff. Plaintiff alleges, however,'that the delivery of such goods-to Glucldick was procured by false and fraudulent representations made by him to plaintiff at the time of such delivery, as to his; *507solvency and financial condition and standing, and as to bis intention to pay therefor, which false and fraudulent representations were knowingly made, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. P. Cox Shoe Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Kervick v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  3. Phelps, Dodge & Palmer Co. v. SamsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Nolan v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Snyder v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. In Re WeissmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API