Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Witham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 16, 2004, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits on February 16, 2004 after she lost her job as a senior project specialist due to a lack of work. She indicated on the business principal questionnaire filled out in connection with her claim that she was the president and a 100% shareholder of a corporation operating a graphic design business. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of McHughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of FrankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KoenesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of Easdon-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. In re the Claim of SpielmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API