Scott v. Renick
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Chancery. Case 20. Appeal from the Fayette Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson
The Circuit Court did. not, in our opinion, err in dismissing Scott’s bill seeking a rescission of his purchase of *64the imported short homed Durham cow Lucilla, from the defendant Renick.
There is no implied warranty in a fair sale of a Durham cow, that she will breed, tho’ purchased for that purpose, and at a price justified by no other object— The maxim cave- ■ atanptor, applies in such a case. Menifee for appellant: Robinson cf- Johnson for appellee.
1st. Though the price ($1000,) indicates very clearly that her presumed capacity as a breeder, was the chief and probably the only inducement to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- McQuaid v. RossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Burnett v. HensleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Griffin v. RunnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Cantrell v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927