Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Vann

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 11, 2011No. 09-4298APublished

1ConcurrenceDavis, Circuit Judge

I am pleased to join Judge King’s fine opinion in full. He demonstrates that without doubt the correct approach in this case (and to the North Carolina indecent liberties statute generally) is the categorical approach and not the modified categorical approach. I write separately to offer the following additional observations.

I

I admire the thoughtful efforts of my authoring colleagues to rationalize the challenging legal standards confronting us. As I understand the opinions that contend the modified categorical approach applies in this case, three distinct constructs seem to be put forward:…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. Juan Raul Izaguirre-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Allen Allison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API