A.H.D. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Judge.
A.H.D, a child, asserts that the trial court erred when it did not request a juvenile justice recommendation on a restrictiveness level after rejecting the community control recommendation.
We affirm, and adopt the interpretation of the second district of section 39.052(4)(e)(2), Florida Statutes (1995):
We do not believe the statute requires the court, once it has already rejected the Department’s non-commitment recommendation to then ask the Department for a second recommendation. A request for a second recommendation would seem particularly unnecessary in view of section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. T.M.B.Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
- R.A.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- B.D.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- A.H.D. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- D. K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998