Legal Opinion

Wing v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1989No. Docket 103982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the circuit court’s grant of defendants’ motion for summary disposition. We affirm and hold that plaintiffs’ action is precluded by governmental immunity.

The parties agree in their briefs that plaintiff Gisele Wing was injured when she fell on the main walkway, also known as the Elephant Walk, of the Detroit Zoo. Plaintiffs argue on appeal that the public building exception to governmental immunity should apply in this case because Mrs. Wing fell on a section of the walkway "adjacent to” the Penguin House. Defendants do not dispute that operation of the zoo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Pichette v. Manistique Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Velmer v. Baraga Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Scameheorn v. BucksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Horace v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Richardson v. Warren Consolidated School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Hall v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Eberhard v. St Johns Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API