Legal Opinion

Hey v. Wilson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 14, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill in chancery. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Randolph county; the Hon. Charles T. Moore, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Creighton

This was a bill in chancery in the Circuit Court of Bandolph county, filed by appellees against appellants, praying for an injunction to restrain appellants from unlawfully interfering with the business of appellees. The ease was tried on appellees’ bill and supplemental bill, and appellants’ answer thereto, and evidence pro and con produced in open court. The trial resulted in a decree in favor of appellees, perpetually enjoining appellants, as prayed.

The bill as abstracted by counsel for appellants is as follows: “The bill alleges that appellees are partners, carrying on a livery business…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. O'Brien v. People ex rel. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Franklin Union No. 4 v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Purington v. HinchliffIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Christensen v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Life Insurance Co. of the United States v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API