Legal Opinion

Klor v. American Airlines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated May 1, 2002, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint by showing that they neither created an unsafe condition nor had actual or constructive notice thereof (see Rajgopaul v Toys “R” Us, 297 AD2d 728 [2002]; O'Callaghan v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 294 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marcelle v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. O'Callaghan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Rajgopaul v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Avellino v. TrizecHahn Newport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Voyages v. Roger's Pharmacy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API