Legal Opinion

Morrilton Lumber Co. v. Groom

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 5, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is conceded that the lien of Charles T. Groom on the lots is superior to the materialman’s lien of the Morrilton Lumber Com-’ pany, but it is claimed the new house and garage which were constructed on the lots from the old lumber from the houses which were torn down and the new lumber which was purchased from the Morrilton Lumber Company is subject to the lien of the lumber company, and that the buildings may be taken off and sold and the proceeds applied equally towards the satisfaction of the judgment of the plaintiff, because the value of the old…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. Mayberry & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Getchell v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Judd v. RieffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. James River Lumber Co. v. DannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Thorpe Block Saving & Loan Ass'n v. JamesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Westmoreland Manganese Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
  2. Wildwood Amusement Co. v. Stout Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Hawkins v. FaubelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. BB & B Construction Co. v. F.D.I.C.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Prugh v. ImhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API