E.H. Development, Inc. v. Kelly Tractor Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam 1
AFFIRMED.
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam 2
We hereby grant appellants’ motion for rehearing and treat it as a motion for clarification.
Appellants have been unable to furnish this court with a transcript of the evidence presented at the final hearing or a reconstructed statement thereof pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(3) which is essential to a proper appellate consideration of the final judgment. Accordingly, we are compelled to affirm the final judgment. Gardner v. Gardner, 501 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Gardner v. GardnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4Cited by3 opinions
- Chaiken v. SuchmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Jones v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of PerryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Bachman v. StonerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990