Kiersky v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the 'District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; John E. McCall, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Harry Kiersky. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was indicted for unlawfully and feloniously carrying on the business of a retail liquor dealer, without having paid the special tax therefor, in violation of the provisions of section 3242, R. S. (Comp. St. § 5965). The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and tlieieupon a motion for new trial was filed, which was overruled by the court. There was also a motion in arrest of judgment, which was likewise overruled, and sentence pronounced.
[1] Counsel for plaintiff in error has, in his brief filed in this case, very clearly stated the material facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lovejoy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Faraone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
- Young v. CorriganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Albert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Supreme Malt Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Laurie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Nicely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.