Sturgis National Bank v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, Associate Justice.
— The verdict of the jury is for a less sum than plaintiff was entitled to, and this error will require a reversal of the judgment and the remanding of the cause for another trial. We will not pass upon the several assignments of error, as such, in the opinion; but will indicate our views upon the points in the case sufficient for the purpose of another trial.
The different phases of the defense set up to the 10 per cent attorney’s fees constitute no legal bar to a recovery upon that portion of the contract, and plaintiff’s exceptions thereto should have been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Mitchell v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Miner v. Paris Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Yetter v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beckham v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- MacRackan v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Compton v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Estate of Dunovant v. Stafford Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- MacRackan v. Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.