Legal Opinion

Arteaga v. Jackson

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 3, 1999No. 06-99-00030-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice CORNELIUS.

Ben Arteaga appeals from an order dismissing his lawsuit for want of jurisdiction. The district court' dismissed the lawsuit because the amount of the claim set out in Arteaga’s petition was below the minimum jurisdictional threshold for the court. On appeal, Arteaga contends that he sought $700.00, an amount within the jurisdictional limits, and seeks reversal.

Historically, a district court’s minimum amount in controversy was $500.00, as set out by Article 1906 of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes. 1 This statutory provision was omitted when Article…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Peek v. Equipment Service Co. of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bybee v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Arnold v. West Bend Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Scott, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
  2. Acreman v. Sharp, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  3. Sanchez v. Kennedy, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. Allen v. Nunez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  5. Anna Maria Herrera v. Household Finance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API