Legal Opinion

Grimes v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 7, 1896No. Congressional 3608Published

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The facts of the case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWeldon, J.

The claimant resided during the war in. Wayne County, Tenn.; and after the war he presented to the Quartermaster-General a claim for stores and supplies alleged to have been taken from him for the use of the Army of the United States.

His claim was rejected by the Quartermaster-General upon the ground that “the stores were not receipted for nor reported to this office by any officer as taken or received by him for army use.” It was referred to this court under the Bowman Act by the Committee on War Claims of the House of Representatives, and is now being considered on the preliminary question…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samples v. Division of HighwaysWest Virginia Court of Claims · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API