Legal Opinion
Kramer v. Eysenbach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 1939No. 28627PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Philip J. Kramer, receiver of the Western Natural Gas Company, filed an action against Bessie C. Eysen-bach, administratrix of the estate of O. K. Eysenbach, deceased, to recover certain sums allegedly disbursed to Eysen-bach improperly at the time the above corporation ceased to do business.
Plaintiff! below alleged his appointment as receiver by the court for the purpose of collecting all claims the corporation has against its directors and stockholders, and an order authorizing this action.
It was further alleged that E. A. Smith entered into a contract with O. K. Eysen-bach, president of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. LemmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- American Trust Co. v. ChittySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Union Coal Co. v. WooleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Continental Oil Co. v. Montana Concrete Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Hargrave v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1941
- Harris v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- GAASCH v. ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.