Legal Opinion

Berry v. Heinz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1965No. 8171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

This is a suit to recover a real estate broker’s commission the plaintiff claims is due under a listing contract with the defendants. After both parties had rested, each moved for a directed verdict and objected to the other’s motion. The trial judge granted the plaintiff’s motion and denied defendants’ motion. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff and this appeal is taken from the judgment.

The plaintiff, Lloyd J. Berry, doing business as Berry Realty, is a real estate broker having his principal place of business at Royalton, Minnesota, with branch offices at Brainerd and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kermit H. Severson, D/B/A Cardel Company v. Marcus FleckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  2. Hanes v. MitchellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. StokkelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Baird v. FuerstNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Battagler v. DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kruger v. SoreideNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. O'Connell v. Entertainment Enterprises, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Johnson v. AuranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. International Feed Products, Inc. v. Alfalfa Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API