Legal Opinion
Amadeck v. Capital One Financial Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 12, 2015No. Master Docket No. 12 C 10064; MDL No. 2416; No. 12 C 10135; No. 11 C 5886; No. 12 C 1061PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*784 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, District Judge:
The three above-captioned, nationwide class actions were filed against Capital One, its subsidiaries, and its Participating Vendors (collectively, “Defendants”),1 as a result of the Defendants’ allegedly using automatic telephone dialing systems or artificial or prerecorded voice messages to contact consumers’ cell phones without pri- or express consent, in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). (Dkt. No. 120.) On December 10, 2012, the United States Judicial Panel on…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Continental Illinois Securities Litigation v. Continental Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Cook v. NiedertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Cheryl Reynolds v. Beneficial National Bank, Appeals of Belinda PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Gehrich v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Kolinek v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Hashw v. Department Stores National BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Brown v. Rita's Water Ice Franchise Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.