Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Kelley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1999No. 1971725Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent. I believe the Court of Civil Appeals reached the correct result in this case, and I would affirm.

The majority relies on United States v. Bajakajian,524 U.S. 321, 118 S.Ct. 2028 (1998), to support its conclusion that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals must be reversed. I believe that Bajakajian is distinguishable, because the underlying crime in that case and the crime in this case are quite different. In Bajakajian, the defendant was guilty only of a failure to report the movement of funds from the United States to another country. The United States Supreme…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. One 1995 Toyota Pick-Up Truck v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API