Legal Opinion

Greenawalt v. Philip Rosenau Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2007No. Civil Action 06-2972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Clark Greenawalt seeks to remand this personal injury case back to the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. I find that jurisdictional and procedural defects require remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

Mr. Greenawalt originally filed the case in the Common Pleas court in April 2006 against many defendants, alleging that they are “jointly and/or severally liable” under state law for the leukemia he developed after workplace exposure to toxic solvents and chemicals. The defendants include manufacturers, producers, and sellers of the chemicals,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ROOTO CORP.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2008
  2. Ball v. Design Master Color Tool, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  3. Ball v. Design Master Color Tool, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
  4. Cummins v. BIC USA, INC.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009
  5. Santiago v. Virgin Islands Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API