Legal Opinion
Jim and Rose Rouse v. Household Finance Corporation
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 2007No. 32886PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
Jim and Rose Rouse (collectively the Rouses, individually Jim and Rose) brought suit against Respondents, Household Finance Corporation and Household Life Insurance Company (collectively HFC) for, inter alia, breach of an insurance contract and negligence. The Rouses appeal from the district court’s grant of HFC’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In February 2003 the Rouses received a home equity loan through Household Finance Corporation. In connection with this loan the Rouses also obtained credit life and disability insurance. No…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Featherston Ex Rel. Featherston v. Allstate InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Gallagher v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shapley v. Centurion Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2013