Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Ryan

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The executor in this case propounds a will and two codicils for probate. Ann Eyan, a legatee named in the will, claims a right to intervene for her interest, and oppose the proof of the first codicil, which revokes the legacy given her by the will. The ground of contestation is alleged fraud and undue influence. Our statute gives no right to any party to appear and contest the probate of a will, except the widow, heirs, and next of kin. This is, however, undoubtedly ón the principle, that these are all the parties interested against admitting the will, being the persons who…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SalomonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. Merrill v. RolstonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881
  3. In re the Probate of an Instrument Purporting to be a Codicil to the Last Will & Testament of CoryellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Lafferty v. LaffertyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881
  5. Dyer v. ErvingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API