Legal Opinion

Rambousek v. Supreme Council of Mystic Toilers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court.— Non. W. G. Thompson, judge. The opinion states the case.—

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, j. —

This action was begun at law to recover the amounts-of two beneficiary certificates issued by the de*376fendant, a beneficiary association doing business under tbe laws of this State, upon the life of one Joseph Rambousek. The defendant admits the issue of the certificates, but denies liability, upon the ground that Rambousek was not a member of the association in -good standing at the date of his death, November 5, 1900. This claim is based on the alleged fact that a beneficiary assessment known in the record* as assessment No. 4, payable October 1, 1900, had been duly. levied under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arrison v. Supreme Council of Mystic ToilersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Rambousek v. Supreme Council of Mystic ToilersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Hetzel v. Knights & Ladies of Golden PreceptSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Clifford v. Catholic Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sleight v. Supreme Council of Mystic ToilersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Wait v. Mystic Workers of the WorldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API