Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Second District Court. cited 1 Whart. Grim. Law, § 699; State v. Jackson, 17 Mo. 544 ; Green v. State, 13 Mo. 382. cited State v. Matthews, 20 Mo. 55 ; 87 Mo. 225.

1Opinion of the CourtWagneb, Judge

The only question necessary to notice springs out of the action of the Circuit Court in excluding the evidence offered by the defendant. The defendant was indicted under the statute (Wagn. Stat. 462, § 55) for willfully and maliciously killing a hog, the property of one Huskey. After the evidence for the State was submitted, the prisoner introduced Samuel Herrington, his father-in-law, and offered to prove by him that on the morning of the day on which the prisoner shot the hog, he (Herrington) requested defendant to go into the woods where he had some wild hogs running and kill thCm; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. State v. GadwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. State v. PraterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. State v. SillbaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API