Legal Opinion

Cephalis v. Briscoe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1953No. [No. 155, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The question to be answered in this appeal from the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City is whether a boy over eighteen, but under twenty-one, has the legal capacity to be named administrator of his father’s estate.

Anthony Cephalis died, intestate, on May 26, 1952, survived by only one child, Stanley, who was then over eighteen years of age. The decedent and his wife were divorced at the time of his death, and he had been living with a sister, Pauline Ostrowski. The son was self-supporting and did not live with them.

Five days after the death of his father, the son wrote a letter to his aunt,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. State Ex Rel. Evans v. WheatleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Stouffer v. StoufferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Crow v. HubardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Behnke v. GeibDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
  2. Johnson v. MacAboyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Courtney v. LawsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API