Stumm v. Hummel
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jasper District Court. Action to recover damages for criminal conversation with the wife of plaintiff. There was a verdict and judgment.in the sum of §1,000. The defendant appeals. The facts involved in the questions passed upon in the opinion will be found fully stated therein.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
Numerous objections to the judgment are urged upon our attention. They will be considered in the order we find them discussed in the briefs of appellant’s counsel.
i. juror:. mterStlon ’ I. A juror, who was called to sit in the case, upon his vow ¿lire stated that he “ had talked with defendant about the case and he has told me his side of it — the facts as he claimed them. They did not make much impression on my mind. Defendant, and I are in a partnership in a nursery, and have been for three years past.” Tie further stated that he thought his sympathies were not with defend*480ant; that he was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Conway v. NicolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
3Cited by18 opinions
- Block v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Bearbower v. MerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Temples v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- State v. MunroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.