Legal Opinion

Tifton Production Credit Ass'n v. Burkhalter Chevrolet Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1955No. 35756Published

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. “The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed unless the verdict as found by the jury, or as directed by the judge, was as a matter of law demanded. Code § 6-1608; Cloud v. Hawkes Co., 18 Ga. App. 772 (90 S. E. 652); Hardin Supply Company v. Parkerson, 53 Ga. App. 342 (185 S. E. 591); Hunter v. Hall, 57 Ga. App. 321 (195 S. E. 327).” Lawson v. Lawson, 61 Ga. App. 787 (7 S. E. 2d 603).

2. Where a corporate holder of a duly recorded bill of sale to secure debt covering various items of personalty, including a described automobile, brings an action of trover to recover the automobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawson v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. Hardin Supply Co. v. ParkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. LedinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Cloud v. Hawkes Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Hunter v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API