Legal Opinion

Lengele v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 8, 2013No. A-10679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

In this appeal, Bobbie Dee Lengele argues that a jury instruction improperly suggested that she could have no "lawful exeuse" for her failure to pay child support if she had ever voluntarily terminated her employment. We agree that this instruction was an incomplete and potentially misleading statement of Alaska law. But we conclude that Lengele failed to tell the trial judge the specific grounds for her objection to this instruction, and that her general objection was inadequate to preserve this issue for appeal. And when we review the evidence submitted at trial, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Johansen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Marquinn Jones-Nelson v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Roth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2014
  4. Hutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API